SOX / ITGC
Support for SOX IT general controls - logical and privileged access, change management, IT operations, control design, testing readiness, evidence standards and deficiency remediation.
Explore this serviceAudit support
Independent testing of IT general controls, with findings that lead to remediation rather than debate.
The business problem
IT controls are usually believed to be working until someone tests them against a complete population. Access reviews cover the systems that are easy to extract, change approvals exist for planned work but not for emergency fixes, and privileged accounts accumulate quietly between reviews.
FaizZab performs IT audit as evidence-based testing over defined populations, producing findings with cause and consequence stated clearly enough that remediation is not negotiated.
Service scope
Scope is agreed against the systems that matter to the control objective, with populations defined before testing begins.
Test the control environment that underpins application and data reliability across in-scope systems.
Test provisioning, modification, removal, periodic review and privileged access over complete user populations rather than convenient samples.
Test the change population for authorization, testing and approval evidence, including emergency and standard changes.
Test job scheduling, backup and restoration, incident and problem management, and monitoring for evidence of consistent operation.
Assess whether the evidence produced by each control is sufficient, complete and retrievable for the period under review.
Document findings with cause, consequence and risk rating, agree management response, and track remediation to verified closure.
Methodology
Agree scope, control objectives and complete populations before fieldwork.
Confirm how each control is designed and operated with the people who run it.
Perform sample testing against defined criteria with documented working papers.
Issue findings with cause, consequence and rating, and agree management responses.
Retest remediated findings to confirm closure rather than accepting assertion.
What you receive
Outcome
Independent, evidence-based assurance over the IT controls the business depends on.
Commercial value
Testing against a partial population produces false assurance. Population completeness is where most IT audits fail.
Stating consequence rather than nonconformity turns findings into prioritized work.
Issues found internally can be remediated before external auditors raise them.
Questions
No. This is an independent IT audit performed for management assurance purposes. It is not a statutory audit and does not imply statutory auditor status.
Yes. Closure verification is a common standalone engagement, particularly where findings were raised by an external party.
Related
Support for SOX IT general controls - logical and privileged access, change management, IT operations, control design, testing readiness, evidence standards and deficiency remediation.
Explore this serviceInternal audit programme design and delivery - audit universe and planning, fieldwork, evidence, findings, corrective action and reporting, for management systems and business processes.
Explore this servicePreparation for a SOC 2 Type II examination - operating effectiveness programme, evidence calendar, recurring control execution, exception and deviation management, access and change evidence, and auditor evidence-pack preparation.
Explore this serviceDesign and implementation of security governance - governance structure and accountability, policy architecture, risk oversight, security metrics and management visibility.
Explore this serviceImportant
FaizZab provides independent IT audit and advisory support. This service is not a statutory audit, does not constitute an opinion on financial statements, and does not imply statutory auditor status.
Tell us your obligation, your timeline and where you are today. We will confirm whether this is the right engagement for you.